Sup
Everybody…
I want your honest opinion on this subject that I have been thinking about. Let me set it up for you…
So about six years ago, the institution decided to undergo a pretty drastic general education curriculum restructure. We went from a structure that was pretty standard and tradition to one that has been called “transformative.” The old general education curriculum dealt with something faculty, staff, and advisors called “paradigms.” Under these paradigms, students basically had specific courses within specific semesters that were responsible for taking. A sample of the paradigm looked like this:
FRESHMAN
FALL SEMESTER SPRING SEMESTER
ENG 1301 – Freshman Comp. I (3) ENG 1302 – Freshman Comp. II (3)
MAT 1311 – College Algebra I (3) HIS 1302 – World Civilizations II (3)
HED 1201 – Concepts of Health (3) POS 2311 – American Government (3)
PED XXXX – Physical Education (1) MUS 1301 – Intro to Music or
HIS 1301 – World Civilizations I (3) ART 1301 – Intro to Art (3)
PSY 2301 – General Psychology CSC 1306 – Comp. & Its Use (3)
or SOC 2301 – General Sociology (3) __________
Total 16 Hours Total 15 Hours
Each year, your semesters were broken down like this. Students were able to track their own progress a little easier and for advisors, it was a matter of checking courses off on your paradigm to make sure that you were on track for graduation or to help you catch up if you were behind.
Now we have something called “pathways” where you are given more choices/options of the courses that you can take. You have to fulfill categories within General Education which include Student Learning Outcomes, Areas of Knowledge, Curricular Themes, and you have to take what is called a Liberal Learning Seminar. You then have to plot those points on a grid in order to assure that you have fulfilled all the requirements.
Given the experiences you have had with advising thus far at the institution, how do you feel about the pathways (which you all are on) vs. paradigms? How do you feel about having options of courses to take? Within the first 60 hours of your education, would you rather have a course that everyone has to take or have different experiences as it relates to coursework? How has the process been for you? Do you understand the pathways? Would you recommend that we keep this structure, go back to what we were doing, or do something different? If you think we should do something different, what do you propose?
Mr. C
This blog is due Friday September 29 by 11:59 PM and should be at least 250 words.
I want your honest opinion on this subject that I have been thinking about. Let me set it up for you…
So about six years ago, the institution decided to undergo a pretty drastic general education curriculum restructure. We went from a structure that was pretty standard and tradition to one that has been called “transformative.” The old general education curriculum dealt with something faculty, staff, and advisors called “paradigms.” Under these paradigms, students basically had specific courses within specific semesters that were responsible for taking. A sample of the paradigm looked like this:
FRESHMAN
FALL SEMESTER SPRING SEMESTER
ENG 1301 – Freshman Comp. I (3) ENG 1302 – Freshman Comp. II (3)
MAT 1311 – College Algebra I (3) HIS 1302 – World Civilizations II (3)
HED 1201 – Concepts of Health (3) POS 2311 – American Government (3)
PED XXXX – Physical Education (1) MUS 1301 – Intro to Music or
HIS 1301 – World Civilizations I (3) ART 1301 – Intro to Art (3)
PSY 2301 – General Psychology CSC 1306 – Comp. & Its Use (3)
or SOC 2301 – General Sociology (3) __________
Total 16 Hours Total 15 Hours
Each year, your semesters were broken down like this. Students were able to track their own progress a little easier and for advisors, it was a matter of checking courses off on your paradigm to make sure that you were on track for graduation or to help you catch up if you were behind.
Now we have something called “pathways” where you are given more choices/options of the courses that you can take. You have to fulfill categories within General Education which include Student Learning Outcomes, Areas of Knowledge, Curricular Themes, and you have to take what is called a Liberal Learning Seminar. You then have to plot those points on a grid in order to assure that you have fulfilled all the requirements.
Given the experiences you have had with advising thus far at the institution, how do you feel about the pathways (which you all are on) vs. paradigms? How do you feel about having options of courses to take? Within the first 60 hours of your education, would you rather have a course that everyone has to take or have different experiences as it relates to coursework? How has the process been for you? Do you understand the pathways? Would you recommend that we keep this structure, go back to what we were doing, or do something different? If you think we should do something different, what do you propose?
Mr. C
This blog is due Friday September 29 by 11:59 PM and should be at least 250 words.